Cost-effective appendectomy. Open or laparoscopic? A prospective randomized study.

نویسندگان

  • T J Heikkinen
  • K Haukipuro
  • A Hulkko
چکیده

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to compare the outcome and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic (LA) and open appendectomy (OA). METHODS Forty consecutive patients were randomized to either the LA (n = 19) or OA (n = 21) group. RESULTS The medians of operative times in the LA and OA groups were 31.5 and 41 min, respectively. The total operation room times were 91 and 82 min, respectively. There was no significant difference in postoperative pain or fatigue, but return to normal life was faster in the LA group (14 versus 26. 5 days). The median hospital costs per patient were 8,538 and 6,788 FIM ($1 US = 4.6 FIM) in the LA and OA groups, respectively; but the total costs among working patients were lower in the LA group (20, 963 versus 27,778 FIM) due to faster return to work. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic appendectomy is as safe as open appendectomy. The hospital costs are higher, but LA offers significant cost savings to the payer for working patients.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Patients With a Body Mass Index of 25 or Greater: Results of a Double Blind, Prospective, Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND The reported advantages of the laparoscopic approach to appendectomy are shortened hospital stay, less postoperative pain, and earlier return to usual activities (work). However, a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial comparing laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy in active-duty males failed to disclose a benefit of laparoscopic appendectomy with regards to postope...

متن کامل

The costs and effects of laparoscopic appendectomy in children.

BACKGROUND Laparoscopic procedures are performed commonly in children. In general, the cost containment of laparoscopic surgery in children has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE To compare the costs of laparoscopic appendectomy with those of open appendectomy. DESIGN Prospective clinical trial between November 1, 1997, and April 30, 2000. For analysis, cost of supplies, operation room use, and ...

متن کامل

Comparison of open and laparoscopic appendectomy in uncomplicated appendicitis: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND In the treatment of a subset of patients with uncomplicated appendicitis, no surgical method has been clearly established as superior. METHODS The present study was a prospective randomized clinical trial. Patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis were recruited for the study. Patients with a preoperative diagnosis of complicated appendicitis were excluded. The patients were rando...

متن کامل

Prospective, randomized comparative study between single-port laparoscopic appendectomy and conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.

INTRODUCTION Laparoscopic appendectomy is probably the technique of choice in acute appendicitis. Single port laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has been proposed as an alternative technique. The objective of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of SILS against conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). MATERIAL AND METHODS From January 2011 to September 2012, 120 patients with acute a...

متن کامل

Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopy in children.

BACKGROUND Laparoscopy may offer fast recovery and improved cosmesis, but its cost has been perceived as excessive. OBJECTIVE To analyze the total hospital costs of laparoscopy vs open surgery. DESIGN Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis evaluating all cases performed in a 36-month period (September 1995 to August 1998). Cases were evaluated for operative time, itemized cost of supplie...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Surgical endoscopy

دوره 12 10  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1998